Friday, May 29, 2009

DESCRIPTIVE TEXT NARRATIVE FOR SMOKE/DUST OBSERVED IN SATELLITE IMAGERY
THROUGH 1630Z May 29, 2009

Great Lakes into mid Mississippi Valley:
Remnant thin smoke from the past few days in the wheat belts of the
Dakotas and southern prairies of Canada have drifted to the southeast
and now covered portions of central Michigan, much of Indiana, southern
and central Illinois, far western Kentucky, eastern and central Arkansas
and Missouri. The smoke was mostly quite thin.

Northern Canada:

A thin ribbon of unknown aerosol was seen in an arc stretching from Great
Slave Lake in Northwest Territory southeastward across Lake Athabasca
toward Reindeer Lake in northern Saskatchewan.

Gulf of Mexico:
Remnant smoke from numerous fires in Mexico/Guatemala fires was mainly
confined to the southern Gulf of Mexico as a frontal zone has pushed
south into the northern Gulf. The smoke was mainly south of 25N and west
of 85W. A patch of moderately dense smoke was seen over the southwest
Gulf into the Bay of Campeche.

Ruminski


THE FORMAT OF THIS TEXT PRODUCT IS BEING MODIFIED. IT WILL NO LONGER
DESCRIBE THE VARIOUS PLUMES THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH ACTIVE FIRES. THESE
PLUMES ARE DEPICTED IN VARIOUS GRAPHIC FORMATS ON OUR WEB SITE:

JPEG:   http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/FIRE/hms.html
GIS:    http://www.firedetect.noaa.gov/viewer.htm
KML:    http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/FIRE/kml.html

THIS TEXT PRODUCT WILL CONTINUE TO DESCRIBE SIGNIFICANT AREAS OF SMOKE
WHICH HAVE BECOME DETACHED FROM AND DRIFTED SOME DISTANCE AWAY FROM THE
SOURCE FIRE, TYPICALLY OVER THE COURSE OF ONE OR MORE DAYS. IT WILL ALSO
STILL INCLUDE DESCRIPTIONS OF BLOWING DUST.

ANY QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS REGARDING THESE CHANGES OR THE SMOKE TEXT
PRODUCT IN GENERAL SHOULD BE SENT TO SSDFireTeam@noaa.gov













 


Unless otherwise indicated:
  • Areas of smoke are analyzed using GOES-EAST and GOES-WEST Visible satellite imagery.
  • Only a general description of areas of smoke or significant smoke plumes will be analyzed.
  • A quantitative assessment of the density/amount of particulate or the vertical distribution is not included.
  • Widespread cloudiness may prevent the detection of smoke even from significant fires.